Dryptosaurus holotype skeleton ANSP 9995 (cast) (Delaware Museum of Natural History):
Links:Photo:
https://images.app.goo.gl/4Ma9Nwjkm8WY11Zh6
Delaware Museum of Natural History:
https://delmns.org/metamorphosis-in-progress/
The Percentage Increase/Decrease Method:
1. Take new number and subtract it from original number.
2. Take that number and divide it by the original number and multiply by 100.
3. That number will by your percentage increase or decrease if it's negative.
132.7 - 130 = 2.7.
2.7 divided by (represented by "/") and multiplied by (represented by "*") equals 2.1.
(2.7/130*100 = 2.1)
2.1 is your percentage increase, or 2.1% increase.
12.2 m + 2.1% = 12.5 meters for "Wyrex."
Links:
Percentage Increase/Decrease Method Links:
"Percentage Change - Percentage Increase and Decrease." SkillsYouNeed:
"Relative Increase." percentage.calculators.ro:
https://percentages.calculators.ro/15-percentage-increase-from-original-number-to-new-value.php
1. ANSP 9995 (Holotype):
Femur (Brusatte et al., 2011, p. 27 Figure 15, A). Scale bar (first one) is 10 cm:
-Estimated full length: 35.5 inches (90.2 cm) (Cope 1869, p. 104).
78.1 cm:
81 cm:
85 - 81 = 4.
4/85*100 = 4.9% decrease.
7.9 m - 4.9% = 25 feet (7.5 meters).
90.2 - 85 = 5.2.
5.2/85*100 = 6.1% increase.
Holotype's stats:
Humerus (p. 19 Figure 11 C): 30.5 cm (at best).
Manual phalanx 1-1 (p. 22 Figure 12, A): 16 cm (at best/most) (Also noted on pp. 20 Table 1 and 47 Table 3) (Note: Incomplete near distal end. Check Table 1).
Femur (p. 27 Figure 15 A): 81 cm (at best).
Tibia (p. 31 Figure 18 A): 81 cm (at best).
Fibula (p. 34 Figure 19 D): 46.5 cm (at best) (Incomplete; see p. 20) (Carpenter et al., 1997, p. 568).
Age: 15. (Woodland et al., 2020, "Results" p. 4, "Ontogenetic age: p. 1) (Carr, 2020, Figure 12, Number 7)
Dryptosaurus holotype:
Femur: 90.2 cm.
Body length: 8.4 meters.
90.2 - 79 = 11.2.
11.2/90.2*100 = 12.4% decrease.
8.4 m - 12.4% = 24 feet (7.4 meters).
Link:
Nanotyrannus is a species of Dryptosaurus:
https://psdinosaurs.blogspot.com/2021/08/evidence-of-subadult-nanotyrannus.html
Woodland et al., (2020) ("Materials and Methods" p. 1):
https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/1/eaax6250
Carr (2020) (Figure 12):
*Femur: 72.0 cm (Larson, 2013, p. 18) (Woodward et al., 2020, Materials and Methods, p. 1) (Theropod Database, Tyrannosaurus rex).
Skull: 77.7 cm (Measured on 8/28/21 in Brusatte et al., 2010, Figure 1 E).
Maxilla: 48 cm (at best) (Measured on 6/10/22 in Brusatte et al., 2010, Figure 1, E).
Dentary tooth row length: 31.5 cm (Measured in photo from Dalman).
Ilium: 79.5 cm (at best) (Measured on 5/20/22 from Holtz's pic).
Humerus: 29.1 cm (Measured on 5/7/22 from Holtz's Twitter Post).
Tibia: 89.5 cm (at best) (Measured on 5/7/22 in Woodward et al., 2020, Supplementary Information, p. 9 Figure S2 B).
Body length: 7.4 meters.
79 - 72 = 7.
7/79*100 = 8.9% decrease.
7.4 m - 8.9% = 22 feet (6.7 meters).
ANSP 9995 (Holotype):
Humerus: 30.5 cm.
Length: 7.5 m.
30.5 - 29.1 = 1.4.
1.4/30.5*100 = 4.6% decrease.
7.5 m - 4.6% = 24 feet (7.2 meters).
"Jane's" stats:
Age: 13 (Woodland et al., 2020, "Results" p. 4, "Ontogenetic age" p.1) (Carr, 2020, Figure 12, Number 5).
Length: 22 feet (6.7 meters).
Skull: 77.7 cm (Measured on 8/28/21 in Brusatte et al., 2010, Figure 1 E).
Maxilla: 36.7 cm (My measurement from Peterson and Daus, 2019).
Dentary: 52 cm (at best) (Measured on 5/20/22 in Brusatte et al., 2010).
Dentary tooth row length: 31.5 cm (Measured in photo from Dalman).
Ilium: 79.5 cm (at best) (Measured on 5/20/22 from Holtz's lecture pic).
Femur: 72.0 cm (Larson, 2013, p. 18) (Woodward et al., 2020, Materials and Methods, p. 1) (Theropod Database, Tyrannosaurus rex).
Links:
Nanotyrannus is a species of Dryptosaurus:
https://psdinosaurs.blogspot.com/2021/08/evidence-of-subadult-nanotyrannus.html
Theropod Database. Tyrannosaurus rex:
http://theropoddatabase.com/Tyrannosauroidea.html#Tyrannosaurusrex
Woodland et al., (2020) (Materials and Methods, para. 1; Results, para. 4; Ontogenetic age, para.1):
Supplementary Materials:
https://www.science.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1126%2Fsciadv.aax6250&file=aax6250_sm.pdf
Carr (2020) (Figure 12):https://peerj.com/articles/9192/
Erickson et al., (2006) (Supplementary Materials) (Pg. 13):
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/suppl/2006/07/11/313.5784.213.DC1/Erickson.SOM.pdf
Brusatte et al., (2010) (Figure 1):
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46288434_Tyrannosaur_Paleobiology_New_Research_on_Ancient_Exemplar_Organisms
Dalman (pers. comm.).
Holtz's Twitter Post:
https://twitter.com/TomHoltzPaleo/status/1367247262124929026?s=20
Larson (2013):
https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-tyrannosaurid-paleobiology.pdf
Skull (Dalman et al., 2018, Figure 15 D):
Age: 7 (Carr, 2020, Figure 12 Number 4).
Body: 26 feet (7.9 meters).
7.5/60.5*100 = 12.4% decrease.
7.9 m - 12.4% = 6.9 meters.
Skull: 77.7 cm.
77.7 - 53 = 24.7.
24.7/77.7*100 = 31.8% decrease.
6.7 m - 31.8% = 15 feet (4.6 meters).
Links:
Nanotyrannus is a species of Dryptosaurus:
https://psdinosaurs.blogspot.com/2021/08/evidence-of-subadult-nanotyrannus.html
Dalman et al., (2018):
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328676947_TYRANNOSAURID_TEETH_FROM_THE_UPPER_CRETACEOUS_CAMPANIAN_TWO_MEDICINE_FORMATION_OF_MONTANA
Skull (Dino Death Match, Nat Geo, 26:13):
Maxilla: 41 (at best) (Incomplete, tip is missing).
(?)Dentary: 52.5 cm (Incomplete; measured up to end of curve in angular).
Humerus (Larson's Twitter Post):Humerus: 27.3 cm (at best).
Radius: 16 cm.
Ulna: 20.4 cm.
Manual phalanx 1-1: 15 cm.
Length:
"Jane":
Skull: 77.7 cm.
Humerus: 29.1 cm.
Body: 6.7 m.
1. Skull:
81 - 77.7 = 3.3.
3.3/77.7*100 = 4.3% increase.
7.2 m + 4.3% = 25 feet (7.5 meters).
*2. Humerus:
29.1 - 27.3 = 1.8.
1.8/29.1*100 = 6.2% decrease.
6.7 m - 6.2% = 21 feet (6.3 meters).
Manual phalanx 1-1:
ANSP 9995 (Holotype):
Manual phalanx 1-1: 16 (incomplete).
Length: 7.5 m.
16 - 15 = 1.
1/16*100 = 6.3% decrease.
7.5 m - 6.3% = 23 feet (7.0 meters).
I'll go with the humerus length.
Link:
Dino Death Match
Larson's Twitter Post:
https://mobile.twitter.com/PeteLarsonTrex/status/762721220701847552
6. HRS11186:
Ulna (SWAU, HRS11186). Scale bar is 10 cm:Length: 23.1 cm (Measured on 6/6/22).
BHI 6437:
Ulna: 20.4 cm.
Length: 6.3 meters.
23.1 - 20.4 = 2.7.
2.7/20.4*100. =13.2% increase.
6.3 m + 13.2% = 23 feet (7.1 meters).
HRS11186's total length: 23 feet (7.1 meters).
6. KUVP 156375 ("Laurel"):
Maxillae (Fossil Forum). I used 5 cm from the scale bar shown:-First (top): 50 cm (at best).
-Second (bottom): 49.5 cm.
Age: Juvenile (Burnham et al., 2018; SVP, 2018) (p. 99):Length:
"Jane":
Maxilla: 48 cm.
Length: 6.7 m.
First maxilla:
1. "Jane":
50 - 48 = 2.
2/48*100 = 4.2% increase.
6.7 m + 4.2% = 23 feet (7.0 meters).
Links:
Photo:
https://images.app.goo.gl/b9aSDriLkGvK9eGT7
Fossil Forum:
http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/topic/93287-the-case-for-nanotyrannus/page/3/
Burnham et al., (2018) (SVP, 2018) (P. 99):
7. HRS08 ("Zuri"):
Maxilla (SWAU, HRS08438). Scale bar is 10 cm:
"Jane":
Maxilla: 48 cm.
Length: 6.7 m.
41 - 48 = 7.
7/48*100. = 14.6% decrease.
6.7 m - 4.6% = 21 feet (6.4 meters).
*Check dentary tooth row*
Link:
SWAU. HRS08438:
https://fossil.swau.edu/link/Public/Browse/Specimen/HRS08438
In summation, most of the "Nanotyrannus" specimens are smaller than the Dryptosaurus aquilunguis holotype, which helps to support my hypothesis that "Nanotyrannus" is actually
Dryptosaurus. "Laurel" is the same size as the holotype despite being a juvenile. HRS11186 is larger than the Dryptosaurus holotype, so this could be another adult specimen of Dryptosaurus aquilunguis.